OperationalResilience.help
The Continuity Desk - important services, kept running
Home / Lines / Line 20

Line 20: Evidence, audit and readiness

Proving resilience to a regulator, an auditor, or a board: evidence trails, examinations, self-assessment, and the gaps that recur most often.

The line guide

Working guides on this line

Common Evidence Gaps

The gaps that recur in resilience files: missing links, undated records, unowned actions, and tests that never touched the dependency that matters most.

Continue reading

Evidence After an Incident

What to preserve, record, and review after a disruption, so the incident becomes a lasting improvement to the service trail rather than a story that fades.

Continue reading

Evidence for Board Assurance

What a board needs to judge resilience assurance: service-level evidence, gaps stated plainly, and a clear distinction between assertion and observed performance.

Continue reading

Evidence Retention and Access

How long resilience evidence should be kept, in what form, and who should be able to find it, so the trail survives staff changes and can be produced without a scramble.

Continue reading

Evidence Trails for a Service

How to build the checkable trail for one service, from its map and tolerance through its tests and incidents, so each claim can be followed back to a record.

Continue reading

External Audit and Assurance

How external assurance differs from internal audit: a defined scope, an outside reader, and a report whose wording and limits need to be read as carefully as its conclusion.

Continue reading

Internal Audit of Resilience

What internal audit adds when it tests resilience from inside the firm: independence from the teams it reviews, a service-by-service scope, and findings that lead to owned change.

Continue reading

Readiness Checklists That Help

What makes a readiness checklist useful instead of cosmetic: a check tied to a service, an arrangement that can be shown, and a result that changes what happens next.

Continue reading

Readiness Without Overclaiming

How to describe readiness honestly: claiming only what tests and incidents have shown, labelling what is untested, and resisting language that outruns the evidence.

Continue reading

Self-Assessment Against DORA

How an EU firm assesses itself against DORA: working through the regulation service by service, recording the basis for each judgement, and keeping DORA separate from UK rules.

Continue reading

Self-Assessment Against UK Rules

How a UK firm assesses itself against the FCA and PRA operational resilience regime: important services, tolerances, mapping, and testing, labelled separately from DORA.

Continue reading